What can the opponent of God do with this?
Q: Is this how Lucifer gave the illusion of snakes with Pharaoh's magicians?
Q: Is this the method Lucifer tapped into for the other "enchantments" of the sorcerers?
Then Pharaoh also called the wise men and the sorcerers: now the magicians of Egypt, they also did in like manner with their enchantments.
Exodus 7:11
"In particular we called special attention to one of the most startling and revolutionary aspects within this new largely disparate and ad
demonstrated – and the surprising proposal by leading physicists to employ and deploy this human capacity in order to investigate the profound and puzzling, but real and fundamental, phenomenon of quantum entanglement.
Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon of deep and lasting connections between any two or more particles which have ever been connected, no matter how far apart they eventually will become in space or time, even on the galactic or cosmic scale.
Moreover, a number of these leading physicists are proposing that a methodology and technology provided by human direct perception of quantum entanglement may actually be one of the best ways to further investigate this phenomenon, and may also actually be the best way to resolve a number of major, persistent questions in all of quantum physics, including
---the nature of entanglement, the so-called measurement problem and the wavefunction – in other words, the ultimate nature of the reality of the universe itself.
The two principle human capacities relevant for
further quantum investigation that appear to have been scientifically established, then, are
(a) single photon detection (SPD; Tinsley et al 2016) and
(b) photon polarization (Ropars et al 2011; Temple et al 2015).
Recently, several studies employing single photons and their polarization have been conducted to test the famous and foundational Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
In brief, this principle was proposed by Werner Heisenberg in the 1920s during the early, formative days of the establishment of
quantum mechanics. Deriving from Heisenberg’s attempt to make sense of “anomalous” discoveries in the quantum realm that appeared to challenge classically empirical and logical principles, Heisenberg found that in order to “fit” the actual data, he was forced to propose that subatomic particles such as electrons could not be measured with completeness in terms of the position or the location of particles and their momentum. One or the other of these could be measured with precision at any given time, which appeared to be a completely contradictory finding in the context of classical physics, based as it was (and still is) on the full knowledge of both the locations and momentums of all objects at all times.
Nevertheless, the HUP continues to be challenged within the field of quantum physics itself, and recently several experiments utilizing photons and polarization have been used to do so. In fact, these studies have found an inconsistency in Heisenberg’s original formulation, in which there was claimed to be a measurement problem that made the determination of both location and momentum to be impossible.
According to this original interpretation, any attempt at measurement on this scale of matter and energy would invariably
The two principle human capacities relevant for
(a) single photon detection (SPD; Tinsley et al 2016) and
(b) photon polarization (Ropars et al 2011; Temple et al 2015).
Recently, several studies employing single photons and their polarization have been conducted to test the famous and foundational Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
In brief, this principle was proposed by Werner Heisenberg in the 1920s during the early, formative days of the establishment of
Nevertheless, the HUP continues to be challenged within the field of quantum physics itself, and recently several experiments utilizing photons and polarization have been used to do so. In fact, these studies have found an inconsistency in Heisenberg’s original formulation, in which there was claimed to be a measurement problem that made the determination of both location and momentum to be impossible.
According to this original interpretation, any attempt at measurement on this scale of matter and energy would invariably
---disturb either the position (location in space)
---or the momentum (movement in space) of the particle,
because the energy required for measurement would alter or “destabilize” the system. Hence, one of the foundational principles of quantum physics, the ultimate impossibility of complete knowledge on the subatomic scale, the most fundamental level of the universe.
While there are limits to what can be known about wave
phenomena at a given point in time, there are ranges to such limits.
The HUP is related to other forms of “uncertainty principles,” often considered together as a class of phenomena referred to as Fourier uncertainty principles, named after a major figure in the history of science and mathematics, Joseph Fourier (18th-19th centuries). Fourier’s and much subsequent scientific and mathematical research has demonstrated that when two conjugate noncommuting properties such as the duration and frequency of a signal are considered simultaneously, the product is not smaller than a certain mathematical limit.
In this adaptation of the scientific framework, it has been shown that adept observational meditation training regimens appear to
surpass all others with respect to intensity, extensiveness, and levels of performance......Moreover these adept traditions deliberately pursue regimens which are based on multisensory integration, and preliminary evidence strongly suggests that this form of training may result in crossmodal, and even supramodal perceptual learning, and advantageous neuroplastic changes.
While there are limits to what can be known about wave
phenomena at a given point in time, there are ranges to such limits.
In this adaptation of the scientific framework, it has been shown that adept observational meditation training regimens appear to
So that the resulting temporal and spatial hyperacuity may transfer between modalities in multiple ways, and auditory hyperacuity may thereby become relevant to multimodal perception on the quantum level in many ways.
Wigner outlined a thought experiment that demonstrated one of the lesser-known paradoxes of quantum mechanics. The experiment shows how the strange nature of the universe allows two observers—say, Wigner and Wigner’s friend—to experience different realities.....That’s provided some entertaining fodder for after-dinner conversation, but Wigner’s thought experiment has never been more than that—just a thought experiment.
Massimiliano Proietti at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh and a few colleagues say they have performed this experiment for the first time: they have created different realities and compared them. Their conclusion is that Wigner was correct—these realities can be made irreconcilable so that it is impossible to agree on objective facts about an experiment.
They use these six entangled photons to create two alternate realities—one representing Wigner and one representing Wigner’s friend. Wigner’s friend measures the polarization of a photon and stores the result. Wigner then performs an interference measurement to determine if the measurement and the photon are in a superposition.
The experiment produces an unambiguous result. It turns out that both realities can coexist even though they produce irreconcilable outcomes, just as Wigner predicted.
In other words, the experiment suggests that one or more of the assumptions—the idea that there is a reality we can agree on, the idea that we have freedom of choice, or the idea of locality—must be wrong."
MaureenSeaburg/PsychologyToday/MIT TechnologyReview
Wigner outlined a thought experiment that demonstrated one of the lesser-known paradoxes of quantum mechanics. The experiment shows how the strange nature of the universe allows two observers—say, Wigner and Wigner’s friend—to experience different realities.....That’s provided some entertaining fodder for after-dinner conversation, but Wigner’s thought experiment has never been more than that—just a thought experiment.
They use these six entangled photons to create two alternate realities—one representing Wigner and one representing Wigner’s friend. Wigner’s friend measures the polarization of a photon and stores the result. Wigner then performs an interference measurement to determine if the measurement and the photon are in a superposition.
The experiment produces an unambiguous result. It turns out that both realities can coexist even though they produce irreconcilable outcomes, just as Wigner predicted.
In other words, the experiment suggests that one or more of the assumptions—the idea that there is a reality we can agree on, the idea that we have freedom of choice, or the idea of locality—must be wrong."
MaureenSeaburg/PsychologyToday/MIT TechnologyReview
*I'm gonna have to go with the idea of Locality must be able to be Manipulated...for we certainly have Freedom of Choice.
--God's Miracles=Reality
--Lucifer's Enchantments=Manipulation of Reality
